Sunday, March 31, 2019

Us (2019) - Jordan Peele



It’s beating a dead horse to say that Hollywood has no new ideas. The fact is they don’t always know how to market a new idea. So everything is usually a remake, a franchise, or the clever soft reboot, where you basically remake a film but pretend it’s part of some extended universe. So when a director makes a horror film that inexplicably gets nominated for real awards, it stands to reason that person becomes a franchise unto himself. Jordan Peele has also cultivated this new-found status as a master of horror to helm a reboot of The Twilight Zone, which hopefully results in less real world fatalities as the 80s reboot.

Hello everyone, thanks for clicking on my blog. I’m here to talk to you about a movie, a new movie. I would say this review is geared more for the people who have either already seen the film or for people who have no interest and just want to read my take on it. That new films is called Us, Jordan Peele’s newest horror film because apparently after a decade as a comedian this is what he’s now known for. 

Blumhouse, makers of a lot of really shitty horror films produced Get Out and inexplicably struck gold. The terrible looking Ma has me convinced this was clearly a one time fluke, but ride that brand as long as you can guys. So it makes it nearly impossible to talk about this film without mentioning Get Out. As a matter of fact people really want you to associate this with Get Out, just like the confusing attempt to link that film with Spike Lee’s BlacKkKlansman last year. Simply saying “Here’s an original horror film” won’t work, marketing matters. So let’s remind you of something already successful. This is the same reason every new Ridley Scott film still says from the director of Alien and Gladiator. Unfortunately the trailers for this film made it seem like the most painfully cliched horror film. Every other shot of the trailer was people making weird creepy faces followed by loud screeches and jump scares. I took a leap of faith that this was just the result of a hack studio assuming this is the only way people would understand that Us is a horror movie.

So let’s talk about the fucking film shall we? Well I was relieved to see this picture didn’t lean into the massive amount of easy to predict cliches the trailer may have hinted at. I didn’t necessarily predict everything that was happening, and there were enough twists that I could put down my “seen it all before” skepticism. Get Out was far from subtle and at least had enough cultural impact to stick with you long after the fact. There are certainly moments and Easter eggs in this film that make you think it might stand up to closer scrutiny but the plot begs to differ. I don’t see this having quite the same cultural impact Get Out had and I would be a little shocked if it’s as fondly remembered come award season. Then again Green Book won best picture, so clearly there is no God and I know nothing.

The problem with Us is precisely that it doesn’t hold up under the microscope. Get Out was a film that had it’s social commentary right on the sleeve so months after the release you could forget a few of the horror film blunders and recall a very solid premise executed satisfactorily. Here the premise is substantially thinner and when it’s fleshed out it results in more of a “what?” response than any elaborate plan of genius. I’m not the first person to think of it as a good M. Knight Shyamalan film, and the ending definitely recalls his work. If you’re swept up in what’s happening the little details of how or why don’t bother you as much. However I’m not sure this film is compelling enough to sustain those moments.

Jordan Peele has seen enough horror films to know the incredible uphill battle that his movies are facing. He wants them to be good, and he wants them to stand up among the greats. Sometimes though the desire to go too far against the grain can make for a sloppy film. Captain Marvel was put in a no-win situation where they could either make a paint-by-numbers origin story or tell a non-linear version that sabotages our emotional connection to our protagonist. Here too Peele wants to take that master of horror mantle seriously so at times it seems like he’s reaching. A few jump scares aside, and way too many creepy grinning or turning your head sideways moments this film avoids many pratfalls. I braced myself for many stupid fake out dead moments, even more jump scares and this largely avoided them. Sure we get extended monologues with the speaker facing away from their audience, and about 1.5 false alarm deaths, but this is nitpicking.

Many people giving this film positive marks are doing so so because they forgive these flaws, and I get that. Hell whenever I’m looking at super hero movies there’s a small pile of bullshit I got to subtly ignore otherwise I’ll hate every damn one I watch. These particular flaws keep Us from being any sort of masterpiece. The movie is well made, there are some interesting set pieces, and overall pretty great performances from the cast but that whiny part of my brain just won’t let me like this film. Also at least the daughter bashed ‘dem brains in good and didn’t do that hit ‘em once thing and then think they’re dead.

So let me vent with a few of my questions. Where the hell did they get all those matching jump suits? Why did they drive presumably all night to get to nearby Santa Cruz, and how did their doppelgangers already get there? How long was that family going to stand on their driveway if they didn’t come talk to them? The cops said they’d be 14 minutes, but never show up, so yeah not really a question just a plot hole. Every tethered person is supposed to marry their above ground counterpart as well? I mean ok I guess? So the doppelgangers grand plan is to murder their tethered humans and then do hands across America? Ok so they’re in an underground system of tunnels and shit, but really they’re fed raw rabbit meat, seems like they could have hooked ‘em up with some bologna or other cheap prison food. Also one of the twins got hit in the head, fell over the balcony and landed in a glass coffee table, yet somehow sprang up hopping around screaming like 30 minutes later? Why is Adelaide (Lupita Nyong’o) yelling “No” at her fake son in slow motion instead of bashing his fucking brains in with the fire poker? Also how fucking fast is her counterpart to steal the real son, run like half a mile to their underground hideout without any of the family noticing?

I know the idea is that you’re just supposed to go with it, but this film doesn’t set up a surreal sort of universe where I’m willing to say “Sure that could happen”. No this film seems to make a point that this could be the real world, or this could happen and it just seems a little sloppy. I do very much like the Player Formerly Known as Mousecop and want to see him get to make more movies but like Get Out I feel like all the interesting parts of this picture have nothing to do with the horror. There are some ideas about class here that were worth exploring. I liked the counterpoint between the two families and the basic idea of returning to the scene of a childhood trauma makes for a compelling plot. However all this ham-fisted nonsense made me wish I was watching another film. Anytime a movie makes you think of The Village or The Strangers it’s never a good thing.

Pictured: A Master of Horror
This movie has already made it’s money and my two cents aren’t going to change people one way or the other, but they are my thoughts. I literally rolled my eyes when the very obtrusive music score started appropriating “I Got Five On It” during the final Adelaide fight. Keep in mind it didn’t bother me when “Just a Girl” started playing in Captain Marvel, this however not so much. The opening text to go along with the painfully drawn out “twist” seemed to kill any ambiguity or subtlety in this film. There are certainly worse ways to spend your time than watching Us, but overall I wouldn’t recommend.

Friday, March 8, 2019

Captain Marvel (2019)


It’s usually impossible for me to discuss a Marvel film without referencing the 20 films that preceded it, but that’s very much intentional. Like Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers musicals (of which I’ve been watching a lot of lately), these films are reliable box office draws that are both helped and hindered by adhering to formulas. There is a comfort in repeating the winning formula, and for the most part all of the films adhere to a similar structure. Usually they open with a bad ass fight scene, often showing the heroes hubris. Then an early conflict arises, usually a pre-lude to a bigger baddy to be fought later, at some point the hero(s) maybe lose their powers or have their raison d’etre questioned. Then they discover the real super power was inside and they emerge more powerful and lots of CGI explosions result in everyone living happily ever after.

Well it only took 11 years and 20 previous films but the good folks at Marvel have at long last decided we’re ready for a film with a digitally de-aged Samuel L. Jackson. Ok maybe that isn’t the highest selling point, there’s also a cat. No I’m talking about Captain Marvel, aka Carol Danvers who happens to be a super hero and also a female. That part is important, so is the fact that this film is set in the 90s, the filmmakers do not want you to forget either of those facts. So for my first actual film review of 2019, I suppose the question is whether or not this film is any good. Let’s dig in shall we?
The fact that this formula does largely work is what has let Disney and Marvel have a license to print money since 2008. It has also led to the dreaded “super-hero fatigue”. When other people try to make their own super hero films they often miss the mark spectacularly and focus more on the formula than the character building moments that really matter. After all only very simple minded people are still impressed by special effects. Not to downplay the tremendous work that goes into making Carol Danvers flying into space and destroying ballistics look plausible if not realistic, but they are certainly taken for granted. Learning what makes Danvers tick is the important thing. The first Iron Man movie was far more interesting seeing Tony try awkwardly to upgrade his armor and weapons, then actually fighting The Dude at the end. It’s what makes the DC movies so unbearable, because their idea of character development is awkward attempts at jokes and almost that exclusively.

Now that’s where I want to get in the problem of this film and Black Panther. In an attempt to show something besides random super powered white people, Disney is walking on egg shells trying not to offend anyone. They are handling Danvers and T’Challa with kid gloves, bending over backwards trying not to offend the “Minority” group of women or sensitive white crusaders aimed at telling you their depiction of black people is less than dignified. It’s one of the reasons why the only time we see well rounded and flawed black characters it’s usually at the hands of black filmmakers. Black Panther made a point of having a black filmmaker direct it and Captain Marvel hands off the duties to Anna Boden and her partner Ryan Fleck. Disney is trying to cover their bases just as they tried to force feed diversity into an intergalactic soap opera known as Star Wars. At least Lucas understood that the human characters were the most boring part of Star Wars.

The point is in trying to show Danvers as a strong independent woman who don’t need no man she is presented as a largely charisma-less archetype rather than a compelling hero. A similar problem happened in Black Panther where Michael B. Jordan’s Killmonger was infinitely more compelling as a villain than anyone else in Wakanda (Shuri the possible exception). That doesn’t mean Jude Law or whoever plays Talos (Ben Mendelsohn) was more interesting it just means that they largely played it too safe with Larson. The best moments of Danvers’ character are relegated to blurry flashbacks that may or may not be real memories for her.

Pictured: A strong independent woman.

Also did you know this movie was set in the 90s? Well you’re about to find out. There’s a Blockbuster, Danvers goes to a Radio Shack, they use pay phones, there’s a cd-rom, even an Alta Vista internet search, and a pager. If that wasn’t obvious enough the soundtrack is loaded with very mid-90s songs and a somewhat out of chronology life-size cut out of True Lies, but I’m nitpicking. I know these moments are meant to be lighthearted, and maybe it’s the opening night crowd effect, but all of these nods to the 90s were received a little too well. I lived in the 90s, it wasn’t that cool, and sure people still played guitars but the music wasn’t that great. Also for the record Blockbuster was horrible and it deserved to go under.

So it might seem at this point that I am that cliched butt-hurt fanboy who doesn’t like a girl in his super-hero movies. Let me squash that right now and say I actually did enjoy this movie. It’s opening fight scene was very Matrix minus the bullet time or Coming to America minus the “hippopotamus shit” lines. The beginning was a little bumpy and made me wonder just what I was into, but I got into it quickly. I appreciated the twists and turns, after a scene or two I stopped worrying about digital de-aging, and the overall structure was something a bit different. This wasn’t a normal super hero origin story, and I also worried it might copy the blueprint of the first Thor movie where Danvers would find herself on Earth, stripped of her power and then learn some claptrap about being a true hero comes from within or some such nonsense. There were a ton of cliches this film could have leaned into, and thankfully it didn’t, guess I shouldn’t be too surprised from the directors of Half Nelson. It even knowingly winked at some of those tropes and then gracefully side-stepped them.

I think to a certain point a good film should be able to side-step the obvious, or make you casually forget flaws. Some films don’t hold up under the micro-scope, whether it be shoddy editing, or unnecessary convoluted schemes, but in the moment they are sins that can be forgiven. Having seen all the Marvel movies more than once (except for Ant Man), I am not at liberty to say how this holds up under repeat viewings, and whether or not I would react differently knowing what I know now.

The pre-mature reports of this film’s disappointing reviews is largely overblown. I have seen a screenshot from my old nemesis imdb listing some 3,000 1 star reviews of the film before it even premiered. Yet another reason why no one should take any ratings from them seriously. Brie Larson herself hasn’t helped things with some of her slightly overblown sound-bytes leading up to this film’s premiere. She has been very anti-patriarchy in the past and with good reason. Good for her using her time in the spotlight to shine a light on some things that desperately need to change. The problem of course is that with any controversial opinion, even a correct one there will be backlash, and for many people this film is the easy target to pin their discontent at.

I could make a case that this film is a potential star turn for her, but lest we forget she did win a best actress Oscar a couple of years ago. Brie Larson is happy to be a super hero, happy to be this super hero, but make no mistake she doesn’t need this shit. This isn’t her big break, simply an awesome opportunity. She’s seen how Scarlet Johansson has had to suffer fools for the past decade in this media circus, and I’m sure Larson is simply trying to get ahead of the curve. Don’t ask her some nonsense about her diet to squeeze into her suit. I will say though Disney dropped the ball on one aspect of this film. Every single super hero has had at least one obligatory topless scene, after all how else can we tell they’re ripped without seeing their abs and pecs. Sadly there is no topless scene of Brie Larson here, double-standards indeed.

It is potentially dicey dealing with a pre-quel of sorts. Captain America’s story is well ingrained and it’s fine to know that he crashed in ice, and was thawed out decades later, that’s comic book lore. For most people the story of Danvers is largely unknown. The movies have made a concerted effort to make her much more powerful than she is in the comics, because they need someone who might actually be able to stand up to Thanos and his six infinity stones in Endgame. If she was just a slightly more powerful Kree soldier, no one would care. We wouldn’t buy Ronan being able to kick Thanos’s ass even before he got an Infinity Stone, so how would Mar-vell be able to? It helps because the history of Danvers and Captain Marvel is not necessarily set in stone. Her origin has shifted at the hands of different writers and the comics have had no less than three different people named Captain Marvel at various points. So her origin suits the MCU and that’s just fine. There isn’t as much nitpicking and like the best of the previous films we don’t need to be familiar with her backstory.

Really happy these guys were actually makeup
We also don’t need to know much about the Kree-Skrull war. We get a little about how Ronan is basically a Kree terrorist that goes rogue by the time Guardians of the Galaxy happens, but he is only partially radicalized here. The Skrulls were rumored to be the space bugs in the first Avengers movie but that has been somewhat cleared up since. All we need to know about their conflict we get from the movie, in very clear shades of gray we learn war is bad. This does somewhat go into the modern Marvel territory of letting our villains be a little less cartoonishly evil and more three dimensional.

There are a number of Easter eggs and clues to future movies. Sure we see a pre-Ronan Korath still on the official side of Kree business, and Agent Coulson is back, but there’s more of course. Maria Rambaeu (Larshana Lynch) is not just Danvers best friend, but also becomes Photon in the comics and for a brief period joins the Avengers as Captain Marvel herself. In a more obvious homage, Goose the cat was clearly named after Top Gun in case it wasn’t obvious enough.

So at the end of the day this film is pretty solid. It’s not going to break box office records, but it’ll make money just like every other Marvel movie does. Hopefully if they ever make a sequel we’ll get more inter-galactic adventures, because frankly Earth is boring. This might very well be seen as a fun appetizer to the Endgame main course, which frankly was how Black Panther was originally conceived but that took on a life of it’s own. Marvel never really had a built in female super hero titan to run her own franchise. Despite many, many compelling and interesting characters, most of the best Marvel women were at best supporting players. In some cases (Phoenix, Sue Storm, Gamora) they were arguably the most powerful members of their groups, but they were still supporting. DC clearly had the jump on this with Wonder Woman, an instantly recognizable female super hero icon. The fact that that movie made a shit load of money was proof that even women wanted to see super heroes on screen. This is long overdue and it is slightly embarrassing that it took until films 20-21 to make this happen (let’s not count Elektra). Now that this is out of the way, we can finally get to that Shang-Chi movie we’ve all been waiting for.